Estudio de intervención para comprobar el efecto de la música clásica en directo durante hemodiálisis sobre la calidad de vida de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica / Intervention study to verify the effect of live classic music during hemodialysis on the quality of life of patients with chronic kidney disease

Introducción y objetivo: La música ha estado estrechamente unida a la medicina desde la antigüedad, y ha aportado numerosos beneficios a la salud de los pacientes. El paciente con enfermedad renal crónica en tratamiento de hemodiálisis (HD), generalmente, presenta una calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) inferior a los valores de referencia de la población general. El objetivo del presente estudio es verificar si la intervención de música clásica en directo e in situ’ durante el tratamiento de HD tiene efectos sobre la CVRS de los pacientes.Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de intervención, prospectivo y aleatorizado por grupos, en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en tratamiento con HD. Durante 4 semanas un grupo de pacientes recibía la intervención con música clásica en directo 30 o 40min durante las sesiones de HD, mientras el grupo control realizaba el tratamiento habitual. Variables descriptivas: edad, sexo, meses en tratamiento, Kt/V, hemoglobina y albúmina. Variable resultado: CVRS, se midió con el cuestionario de salud Kidney Diseasse Quality of life (KDQOL-SF) antes y después de la intervención musical. (AU)

Introduction and objective: Music has been closely linked to medicine since ancient times, and has brought numerous benefits to the health of patients. Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) generally have a health-related quality of life (HRQL) lower than the reference values of the general population. The objective of the present study is to verify if the intervention of classical music live and “in situ” during the treatment of HD has effects on the HRQL of the patients.Materials and methods: A prospective, group-randomized intervention study of 4 weeks’ duration was carried out in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing HD. Descriptive variables are included for data analysis: age, sex, months in treatment, Kt/V, hemoglobin and albumin. Result variable: HRQL, measured with the Kidney Disease health questionnaire Quality of Life (KDQOL-SF) before and after the musical intervention. (AU)

Influential factors on dose by ionic dialysance in daily practice in chronic hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The determination of Kt/V by ionic dialysance is a technique that has extended its use in hemodialysis clinics. The clinical guidelines have reflected the need to validate this method as a determinant of the dose of dialysis. OBJECTIVES: Determine in daily practice, the influence of hemodialysis characteristics and medication on Kt/V results by ionic dialysance (Kt/V OCM) and compare them with Kt/V measures by serum urea (Kt/V Daugirdas). DESIGN: Cross-sectional and observational study. PARTICIPANTS: 127 patients on chronic hemodialysis. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive variables, study variables (Kt/VOCM, Kt/VDaugidas), and the variables that modified the effect (patient temperature, serum sodium, vascular access, recirculation, blood flow, hemodialysis technique, dialyzer, acid concentrate, conductivity, dialyzate flow). RESULTS: The mean of Kt/V Daugirdas was 1.84 and the Kt/VOCM mean 1.65; Pearson's was CC r=0.54; P<0.001 and Lin CCC=0.48. In the linear regression, the variables related to hemodialysis technique showed no statistical association with the measurement obtained by Kt/VOCM. Monosodium phosphate and 20% sodium chloride dispensing were associated with a higher Kt/VOCM. CONCLUSIONS: The different technical aspects noted during HD sessions do not influence Kt/V OCM outcomes. Kt/V determined by ionic dialysance isn't similar to that determined by serum urea. When assessing dialysis doses measured by dialysance, consider that it is not the same as determined with serum urea, but it provides an approximation to estimate dialysis doses in real time. It is necessary to consider if drugs or supplements have been administered that can modify it when interpreting the results.

Cohort study with patients older than 80 years with stage 5 chronic kidney failure on hemodialysis vs conservative treatment: Survival outcomes and use of healthcare resources.

Renal replacement treatment has not been generalized to the elderly for different reasons. The main objective of the present cohort study is to compare survival in patients older than 80 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on renal replacement treatment with those on conservative treatment. The use of healthcare resources is compared too. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was run with the outcome variable death during the follow-up period. The independent variables were treatment type, age, gender, smoking habit, serum albumin, hemoglobin, Charlson Index, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, and neoplasm. For outcome variable "death," renal replacement treatment obtained a hazard ratio of 0.273 (P .006, CI95% 0.108-0.686) vs conservative treatment. In conclusion, patients older than 80 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on renal replacement treatment presented a lower mortality risk than those receiving conservative treatment. Comorbidity and age are both associated with mortality, but do not cancel out the survival advantage. In healthcare resources, the renal replacement treatment group made greater use of tests, medical visits and consumption of hospital dispensing drugs, but there were no differences with respect to the days of hospital admission or assistance in home hospitalization.

Influence of Physical Exercise on the Dialytic Adequacy Parameters of Patients on Hemodialysis.

It has been suggested that physical exercise in chronic hemodialysis could improve dialysis dose and reduce postdialysis rebound. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare a group of patients doing physical exercise during the first 2 h of hemodialysis sessions and another group doing physical exercise at home. The descriptive variables, dialysis doses measured by KtV, and rebounds (urea, creatinine, potassium, phosphorus), were recorded. For 69 patients: the mean KtV was 1.84; the 30-min rebound of creatinine was 32.37%, urea 24.39%, potassium 15.31%, and phosphorus 51.29%. For each patient, the basal measurement was compared with those determined when performing physical exercise; no statistically significant differences were observed between the changes determined to dose and rebound in the group with hemodialysis exercise compared to those of the home exercise group. In conclusion, performing physical exercise during the first 2 hours of hemodialysis sessions neither lowered postdialysis molecules rebound nor improved dialysis dose.